Human Made Art – free range!

Consent Declaration

Deep Dream State is a surreal audio drama written and produced by Neural Nets and Pretty Patterns. The series merges lucid dreaming, hypnosis, and transformation into psychological fiction exploring the boundaries of control, identity, and desire.

All performances are works of fiction and take place within a consensual creative context.

Plot Synopsis (spoilers)

“The psychoanalyst’s couch becomes merely another version of this bondage, another space where a woman’s reality is rewritten according to the desires and theories of those with institutional power.”

— Juliet Mitchell, Psychoanalysis and Feminism

At the Sitri Institute, researchers Meg and Tessa confront a disturbing discovery that seems to expose the darkest secrets of the facility itself. In a heated session conducted under the watchful eye of their apparent superior, Dr. June Lowell, they believe they’ve finally understood the mechanisms of control operating within these walls, a nightmare scenario they think they can document and comprehend. They speak with clinical precision about manipulation, about the architecture of coercion, about subjects and observers maintaining professional distance. But their certainty shatters when they recognize the machinery they’re describing is already operating on them. Their own speech becomes evidence of their subjugation. They realize, too late, that they’ve been operating inside a Freudian nightmare parlor, where the line between investigation and entrapment has already collapsed. There is no outside position from which to observe; observation itself is the trap.

Before Meg and Tessa can fully process this revelation, before they can articulate what has happened to them, a new case file arrives across their desk: Oona Reyes, thirty-two, former TikTok wellness celebrity and TempleBridge facilitator. The dossier is extensive, remarkably so. It chronicles her mercurial career trajectory: pole dancer to fitness influencer, then breakout digital fame, then wellness guru, and finally something the legal system struggled to categorize. The file details her involvement in intensive retreats that employed experimental mind synchronization headbands and synchronized dreaming protocols. Participants would spend weeks in shared sleep states, their brainwaves aligned through proprietary technology, their unconscious minds woven together in what cult exit counselors would later describe as “dream linking.” Legal documents confirm a deferred prosecution agreement. Oona had been fortunate enough, the file notes with clinical detachment, to draw a sympathetic judge. But the true scope of what occurred during those weeks-long retreats remains partially obscured by legal redactions and institutional discretion.

As Meg and Tessa begin examining Oona’s archived case materials, they uncover evidence of something far more sophisticated than typical cult manipulation. The dream linking achieved by Oona’s group wasn’t psychological theater, it was a functional technology of consciousness itself. Multiple participants reported not merely similar dreams but identical dream narratives, identical landscapes, identical voices. Eight individuals entered a unified trance state and emerged having shared the same nocturnal experiences. In those shared dreams, Oona’s voice became ubiquitous, repetitive, mantric. Participants spoke of kneeling circles at dawn, of synchronized breathing, of waking uncertain whether they had been subjects in someone else’s dream or dreamers themselves. One participant described the experience as “a consciousness that was no longer individual but distributed across all of us, thinking through all of us at once.”

But as the researchers dig deeper into Oona’s methodology, they begin to recognize something chilling: the architecture of her experiments is mirrored precisely in the protocols of the Sitri Institute itself. The synchronized dreaming techniques she pioneered are not so different from the observation chambers where Meg and Tessa now work. The mantric repetition, the careful documentation, the blurring of roles between facilitator and participant. These patterns are not unique to Oona’s criminal enterprise. They are structural features of the Institution. The nightmare parlor does not contain Oona’s work; Oona’s work is merely one manifestation of a much larger machinery.

The researchers come to understand that the Sitri Institute is not an institution observing pathology from a position of clinical safety. It is itself a technology of control, a Freudian nightmare made institutional. Every interview is an interrogation. Every session is a conditioning. The distinction between researcher and research subject has never truly existed; it has merely been deferred, postponed, awaiting the moment when the difference would be revealed as illusory. Meg and Tessa’s investigation into Oona Reyes is not an act of professional inquiry. It is another loop in the machinery, another iteration of the dream from which they cannot wake.

By the end of the session, Meg and Tessa understand that to know Oona’s crimes requires confronting the machinery of their own Institution, and confronting that machinery means acknowledging their complicity in it, their willing participation in systems of control so sophisticated that investigation itself becomes another form of capture. The Sitri Center, they realize, is not seeking to cure or understand Oona. It is seeking to absorb her techniques, to perfect them, to integrate them into its own apparatus. And Meg and Tessa, by investigating, are not exposing this machinery. They are refining it.

The nightmare does not end with revelation. It deepens.